<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haskell-style Parser Combinators in Scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaurz.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/haskell-style-parser-combinators-in-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaurz.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/haskell-style-parser-combinators-in-scheme/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 04:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: shaurz</title>
		<link>http://shaurz.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/haskell-style-parser-combinators-in-scheme/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>shaurz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 05:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaurz.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-458</guid>
		<description>I haven't used them in practice (this is my first stab at implementing them), but I like the idea. Most of the parsers I've written were good old recursive descent. PEGs also interest me (especially the work of VPRI &#38; co), and they which have a nice solution to the left-recursion problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t used them in practice (this is my first stab at implementing them), but I like the idea. Most of the parsers I&#8217;ve written were good old recursive descent. PEGs also interest me (especially the work of VPRI &amp; co), and they which have a nice solution to the left-recursion problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Kuhn</title>
		<link>http://shaurz.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/haskell-style-parser-combinators-in-scheme/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Kuhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaurz.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Hehe, these parser combinators really seem to generate quite some noise these days. Cool to see that people like them ... I have written all my parsers that way since years, but only learned of the proper term some months ago via gilad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, these parser combinators really seem to generate quite some noise these days. Cool to see that people like them &#8230; I have written all my parsers that way since years, but only learned of the proper term some months ago via gilad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
